Kernochan Center for Law, Media and the Arts

THE VISUAL ARTS INFRINGEMENT DATABASE

Home
>
Submission Status:
Complete
Test Data Only

Sahuc v. Tucker

300 F.Supp.2d 461 (E.D. La. 2004) aff'd 166 Fed. Appx. 157 (5th Cir. 2006)
Issue(s):  
Substantial Similarity
Copying?
Idea/Expression
Overview

Photographer Louis Sahuc brought suit against photographer Lee Tucker, alleging that Tucker infringed his photograph of the Decatur Street Gate entrance to Jackson Square and St. Louis Cathedral. The allegedly infringing photograph captured the same scene with different framing and details. The district court granted summary judgment for Tucker after placing the photographs side-by-side and concluding that, although the works featured the same locale, differences in presentation created distinct expressions.

Case Summary

Louis Sahuc was a New Orleans-based photographer and gallerist. On a foggy morning in 1999, he captured Jackson Square and the St. Louis Cathedral in a photograph titled Decatur Street Gate. Lee Tucker is another New Orleans-based artist, who became familiar with Decatur Street Gate after seeing the photograph at Sahuc’s gallery and purchasing a poster with the image. In 2001, Tucker photographed the same scene; however, in Tucker’s Breaking Mist, puddles are visible at the bottom of the image, and the framing accentuates different aspects of the scene. Neither the validity of Sahuc’s copyright in Decatur Street Gate, nor Tucker’s access to the image were at issue; liability turned solely on whether there was substantial similarity of expression between the copyrightable elements of Decatur Street Gate and Breaking Mist. Both photographs express the idea of Jackson Square in foggy light, the idea itself is not copyrightable. Laid side-by-side, it becomes evident the images are composed differently, emphasizing different elements of the location. Breaking Mist is also in color, while Decatur Street Gate was photographed in black-and-white. Overall, the district court determined that the works have different artistic expressions. Thus, the district court concluded Tucker’s work was not substantially similar to that of Sahuc. Sahuc appealed and the Fifth Circuit affirmed that the works were not substantially similar in an unpublished decision.

Full Text of Case
Case Commentary
Additional Images
Prior Art
No items found.
Open Additional Images PDF  In Separate Tab
Additional Materials
Links to Artists' Websites
Image Source Credits